Is It Really Imposter Syndrome—Or Is the System Built to Make You Feel Small?
When Self-Doubt Isn’t Just in Your Head, but in the Room
It often begins quietly.
You’re in the room. The meeting starts, and though your title matches the others, the attention drifts elsewhere. When you speak, people nod, but rarely build on your ideas. When others say the same thing minutes later, it lands differently. Louder. More legitimate.
You wonder if you imagined it. You check your tone, your posture, your phrasing. You start to revise—not just your emails or your slides, but your presence.
And eventually, you start to doubt how you’re perceived, and whether you belong at all.
We’ve come to call this imposter syndrome: the sense that you’re faking your way through success, and that one day someone will find out. But often, what we label as self-doubt is not internal at all. It’s the cumulative impact of being in spaces that were not built to recognize your voice.
What we call imposter syndrome is sometimes just structural exclusion that is absorbed over time, until it sounds like your own voice.
The Language We Learn Too Early
The term "imposter syndrome" entered our cultural lexicon in the late 1970s, originally describing high-achieving women who attributed success to luck rather than skill. Since then, it’s become a default explanation for professional insecurity.
You doubt yourself? Must be imposter syndrome. Read this listicle. Say these affirmations. Rewire your mindset and you will overcome it.
But when the same groups—women, people of color, first-generation professionals—report these feelings over and over, across industries and generations, we have to ask: is the problem internal confidence? Or is it external design?
If you’re constantly overlooked, interrupted, underestimated, or expected to prove your worth twice over, is it any surprise that your confidence doesn’t hold?
We rarely ask what these feelings are a response to. Instead, we teach individuals to manage their doubt in isolation, while leaving the systems that produce it intact.
The Performance of Belonging
Many workplaces still reward a narrow performance of credibility: confident, concise, assertive—but not too assertive. Decisive, but not emotional. Warm, but not soft. Leaders are expected to sound like what leadership has historically looked like.
If you don’t fit that mold, your competence is often questioned subtly, through feedback that’s hard to name, let alone challenge. You might hear, “You’re not quite ready,” or “We just need someone who can really own the room.”
You might get invited to speak, but not to decide. You might get praised for your polish, but passed over for promotion.
And when this happens repeatedly, you internalize the message: that your value is conditional, that your presence is fragile, that your confidence must be rationed carefully.
This is not imagined. It’s inherited. Learned through experience. And reinforced in institutions where power is unevenly distributed but rarely named.
The Real Cost
What happens when people consistently doubt their own authority?
They over-prepare and under-speak. They self-edit. They say less, later. They avoid risk, even when they have something valuable to offer. They stay quiet in rooms where they should be leading.
And the cost isn’t just personal. Organizations lose ideas, talent, and perspective. They reinforce sameness under the guise of professionalism. They perpetuate inequality while telling individuals to overcome it alone.
The narrative of imposter syndrome implies that the problem lives inside the individual. But often, it lives in the silence between what’s said and what’s implied. In who gets to take up space without asking. In who is expected to earn their seat again and again.
What If the Doubt Isn’t Yours?
This doesn’t mean confidence work is futile. But it does mean we need to stop treating professional doubt as a personal defect. For many, the question isn’t, “How do I stop feeling like a fraud?” It’s, “How do I hold onto my voice in a room that was never built to hear it?”
That’s a different kind of work. It involves rebuilding your sense of authority—not from slogans or self-talk, but from clarity about what you’ve contributed, and built. It comes from finding spaces where your leadership is reflected back to you, not questioned by default.
It also involves naming the systems for what they are. Because the more you understand the architecture of exclusion, the less likely you are to blame yourself for its effects.
You are not an imposter in a system that was never meant to see you.
You’re someone who learned how to adapt to survive, and now you’re learning how to lead without shrinking.
The voice of doubt may still visit. But maybe now you’ll know that it was never yours to carry alone.
Such a sharp and necessary reframe, Carrie. 🙌
Startup founders often talk about “hiring the best,” but then build cultures where only a narrow type of leadership is recognized. If people constantly feel the need to prove they belong, it’s not imposter syndrome—it’s a design flaw. The real work is creating environments where everyone’s voice has room to lead.
Great writing. As a neurodiverse (ADHD) person, I can assure you, the system isn’t built for us to easily become trusted leaders - unless we medicate, overwork, and mask heavily. All of these things can often lead to to extreme self-doubt and burnout.
Solidarity with all those for whom the system isn’t well-built.